Everything about The Vanguard Rocket totally explained
The
Vanguard rocket was intended to be the first
launch vehicle the
United States would use to place a
satellite into orbit. Instead, the
Sputnik crisis caused by the surprise launch of
Sputnik 1 led the U.S. to quickly orbit the
Explorer 1 satellite using a
Juno I rocket, making
Vanguard I the second U.S. orbital launch.
Vanguard rockets were used by
Project Vanguard from 1957 to 1959. Of the eleven Vanguard rockets which the project attempted to launch, three successfully placed satellites into orbit.
Overview
In 1955, the USA announced plans to put a scientific satellite in orbit for the
International Geophysical Year (IGY) in 1957/58. At that time there were three possible candidates for the launch vehicle: the Air Force's
SM-65 Atlas, a derivative of the Army's
SSM-A-14 Redstone, and a Navy proposal for a three-stage rocket based on the
RTV-N-12a Viking sounding rocket. However, the Atlas and Redstone ballistic missiles were top-priority military projects, which were not to be slowed by pursuing a secondary space launch mission. Therefore the Navy's project, named Vanguard, was selected in September 1955 as the first satellite launch vehicle of the USA. The Martin company, which had also built the Viking, became prime contractor for the launch vehicle.
Politics also played a major role in the selection of Vanguard. The Army's Redstone-based proposal would likely be ready earlier for a first satellite launch. However, Vanguard was a project of the NRL (
Naval Research Laboratory), which was regarded more as a scientific than a military organization. This helped to emphasize the non-military goals of the satellite program. This was considered important, because a discussion whether overflights of foreign countries by satellites were legal or not was to be avoided.
The Vanguard rocket was designed as a three-stage vehicle. The first stage was a General Electric y-405 liquid-fueled engine (designated XLR50-GE-2 by the Navy), derived from the engine of the RTV-N-12a Viking. The second stage was the Aerojet General AJ10-37 (XLR52-AJ-2) liquid-fueled engine, a variant of the engine in the RTV-N-10 Aerobee. Finally, the third stage was a solid-propellant rocket motor. All three-stage Vanguard flights except the last one used a motor built by the Grand Central Rocket Company. Vanguard had no fins, and the first and second stages were controlled by gimballed nozzles. The second stage also housed the vehicle's telemetry system, the inertial guidance system and the autopilot. The third stage was spin stabilized, the spin being imparted by a turn-table on the second stage before separation.
Launch summary
The first two flights of the Vanguard program, designated Test Vehicle (TV)-0 and -1, were actually the last two remaining RTV-N-12a Viking rockets. TV-0, launched on
December 8,
1956, primarily tested new telemetry systems, while TV-1 on
May 1,
1957 was a two-stage vehicle testing separation and ignition of the solid-fueled upper stage of Vanguard. TV-2, launched on
October 23,
1957 after several abortive attempts, was the first real Vanguard rocket. The second and third stages were inert, but the flight successfully tested 1st/2nd-stage separation and spin-up of the third stage. However, by that time, the Soviet Union had already placed the "
Sputnik" satellite into orbit, and therefore project Vanguard was more or less forced to launch its own satellite as soon as possible. Therefore, a very small experimental satellite (called the "grapefruit" and weighing only 1.8 kg (4 lb)) was added to
TV-3, which was to be the first test of an all-up Vanguard rocket. Although the NRL and Martin tried to emphasize that the TV-3 mission was a pure test flight (and one with several "firsts"), everyone else saw it as the first satellite launch of the Western world. When TV-3 exploded a few seconds after lift-off on
December 6,
1957, this was accordingly viewed, at least in the eye of the general public, as a major embarrassment and a disaster for the U.S. space program.
Flight TV-3BU (BU = Backup) on
February 5,
1958 broke up after 57 seconds because of a control system malfunction, but TV-4 on
March 17,
1958 finally succeeded in placing a "Grapefruit"-type satellite into orbit. By that time, however, the Army's
Juno (
Jupiter-C) had already launched the
United States' first satellite. The TV-4 satellite, labeled
Vanguard 1, had reached a relatively high orbit (3966 km (2465 miles) x 653 km (406 miles)) and is currently the oldest human artifact in space. The following four flights, TV-5 and SLV (Satellite Launch Vehicle)-1 through -3 all failed, but on
February 17,
1959, SLV-4 launched
Vanguard 2 (weighing 10.8 kg (23.7 lb)) into orbit. The SLVs were the "production" Vanguard rockets. SLV-5 and -6 failed again, but the final flight on
September 18,
1959 successfully orbited the 23.6 kg (52 lb)
Vanguard 3 satellite. That last mission was designated TV-4BU, because it used a remaining test vehicle, which had been upgraded with a new third stage, the Allegheny Ballistics Lab X-248A2 Altair. This more powerful motor enabled the launch of the heavier payload. The combination of the AJ10 liquid engine and X-248 solid motor was also used, under the name Able, as an upper stage combination for Thor and Atlas space launch vehicles.
Mission
In August
1955, the
DOD Committee on Special Capabilities chose the NRL proposal as it appeared most likely, by spring
1958, to fulfill the following:
- Place a satellite in orbit during the IGY
- Accomplish a scientific experiment in orbit
- Track the satellite and ensure its attainment of orbit
Project Vanguard was chosen from three proposals presented by the
United States Air Force, the
United States Army, and the
United States Navy. The Army's
ABMA under Dr.
Wernher von Braun had suggested using a modified
Redstone rocket (see:
Juno I) while the Air Force had proposed using the untested
Atlas rocket.
Launches
Vanguard launched 3 satellites out of 11 launch attempts:
Vanguard TV3 - December 6, 1957 - Failed to orbit 1.36 kg (3 lb) satellite
Vanguard TV3 Backup - February 5, 1958 - Failed to orbit 1.36 kg (3 lb) satellite
Vanguard 1 - March 17, 1958 - Orbited 1.47 kg (3.25 lb) satellite
Vanguard TV5 - April 28, 1958 - Failed to orbit 10.0 kg (22 lb) satellite
Vanguard SLV 1 - May 27, 1958 - Failed to orbit 10.0 kg (22 lb) satellite
Vanguard SLV 2 - June 26, 1958 - Failed to orbit 10.0 kg (22 lb) satellite
Vanguard SLV 3 - September 26, 1958 - Failed to orbit 10.0 kg (22 lb) satellite
Vanguard 2 - February 17, 1959 - Orbited 9.8 kg (21.6 lb) satellite
Vanguard SLV 5 - April 13, 1959 - Failed to orbit 10.3 kg (22.7 lb) satellite
Vanguard SLV 6 - June 22, 1959 - Failed to orbit 10.3 kg (22.7 lb) satellite
Vanguard 3 - September 18, 1959 - Orbited 22.7 kg (50 lb) satellite
Specifications
Stage Number: 1 - Vanguard
- Mass: 7,661 kg
- Empty Mass: 811 kg
- Thrust (vac): 134.7 kN
- Isp: 270 s (2.6 kN·s/kg)
- Burn time: 145 s
- Isp (sea level): 248 s (2.4 kN·s/kg)
- Diameter: 1.14 m
- Span: 1.14 m
- Length: 12.20 m
- Propellants: Lox/Kerosene
- Engines: X-405
Stage Number: 2 - Delta A
- Mass: 2,164 kg
- Empty Mass: 694 kg
- Thrust (vac): 33.8 kN
- Isp: 271 s (2.7 kN·s/kg)
- Burn time: 115 s
- Diameter: 0.84 m
- Span: 0.84 m
- Length: 5.36 m
- Propellants: Nitric acid/UDMH
- Engines: AJ10-118
Stage Number: 3 - Vanguard 3
- Mass: 210 kg
- Empty Mass: 31 kg
- Thrust (vac): 11.6 kN
- Isp: 230 s (2.3 kN·s/kg)
- Burn time: 31 s
- Isp (sea level): 210 s (2.1 kN·s/kg)
- Diameter: 0.50 m
- Span: 0.50 m
- Length: 2.00 m
- Propellants: Solid
- Engines: GCRC
Further Information
Get more info on 'Vanguard Rocket'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://vanguard_rocket.totallyexplained.com">Vanguard rocket Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |